US lobster fishery violates Endangered Species Act, judge declares

Published on
April 10, 2020

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg filed a 20-page order Thursday, April 9, declaring the American lobster fishery violates the Endangered Species Act.

The federal lawsuit was filed to challenge a biological opinion filed by NMFS in 2014 stating that the American lobster fishery “may adversely affect, but is not likely to jeopardize, the continued existence of North Atlantic right whales.”

The judge ruled against NMFS, noting that the agency failed to include an “incidental take statement.” That failure, the judge declared, renders the biological opinion illegal under the Endangered Species Act.

The suit – filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation and several other environmental groups – is similar to the West Coast Dungeness crab lawsuit (led by the Center for Biological Diversity) which also claimed the fishery violated the ESA. The finding there forced the crab fishery to file for an incidental take permit, a process that can take years, and negotiate with the plaintiffs on whether there will be fishing seasons in the interim and what those opening and closing parameters will be.
Fishing leaders on the West Coast have worked for many years with other stakeholders in a gear working group to find gear solutions to interactions with marine mammals. The Center for Biological Diversity was a member of that group, which made the sting of the lawsuit that much harder for the fleet.
The fleet has taken some extreme measures to ensure that its season works around whale migration patterns to prevent a complete shutdown.
Similarly, U.S. lobster fleets and fishery leaders have long been leaders in reducing interactions with marine mammals, often voluntarily implementing expensive gear changes, and time and area closures.
A 2017 spike in Atlantic right whale deaths caused in part by the population’s migratory shift into Canada’s snow crab and lobster grounds put U.S. fleets back into the spotlight and left them susceptible to lawsuits despite years of efforts to work with environmental groups, federal agencies and scientists to ensure a fishery with minimal interactions.

At an open forum with NOAA leadership at the Maine Fishermen’s Forum in March, stakeholders pressed the agency on its drive to enforce gear changes (through the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Team) that could endanger the lives of fishermen with little evidence that the changes would save any whales.

“If the right whale population is so dire how can the agency justify targeting only the lobster fishery?” Patrice McCarron, executive director of the Maine Lobstermen’s Association, asked the panel.

“It’s not within our control to force Canada to take action,” replied Chris Oliver, NMFS administrator.

The Maine Lobstermen’s Association and Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association were not immediately available for comment. The Massachusetts association intervened in the case in 2018.

Photo courtesy of the Maine Lobster Marketing Collaborative

National Fisherman is an online resource for commercial fishing professionals, providing access to the latest news and information about the commercial marine industry in a single place.

Want seafood news sent to your inbox?

You may unsubscribe from our mailing list at any time. Diversified Communications | 121 Free Street, Portland, ME 04101 | +1 207-842-5500